Article by Lynne Suzanne
My
visit to a UK handling house was a real eye-opener.
Here,
all the competition entries, after being
delivered through the mail, are stored in a
safe place until the closing date has
passed. The number of entries received to
each competition are recorded and this
information given to the promoters.
Once the entries are opened, qualifiers,
whether it be a till receipt, box top or
label, are checked and all entries with the
correct answers to the first part of the
task are placed on one side for the next
stage. A percentage of entries would have
been disqualified, due to some infringement
of the rules, i.e. illegible writing,
omission of qualifying till receipts and
incorrect answers.
Where a tiebreaker slogan is involved, a
percentage of entries will be discarded at
the preliminary judging session.
Reasons may be: the tiebreaker slogan
exceeds the allowed word limit, illegible
entries, too many slogans are very similar
or the slogan isn't considered good enough
to reach the next stage.
Normally,
two lists are drawn up. One containing the
entrants names and addresses, the other,
their tiebreaker slogans. A number is
allocated to each entrant so that when the
winner is chosen, their slogan can be
matched up with their name and address. The
latter list containing only numbered
tiebreaker slogans being the one the judges
will see.
The
judging panel may consist of a
representative from the manufacturer, the
competition promoter or advertising agency,
handling house personnel and independent
professional people, perhaps totaling,
three, five or seven.
The
judges are given the criteria for the
tiebreaker, including brief details of the
product, the task and the word limit. They
then study their list of tiebreakers and
mark off any which they think are worthy of
further consideration. Once this has been
completed and a list of short-listed
tiebreakers arrived at, they will discuss
collectively each tiebreaker, reading these
out aloud, to award an overall rating.
At
the close of the judging session, usually
only a few tiebreakers will stand out as
exceptional and the judges will
place these in order of preference.
The tiebreakers are then married up with the
corresponding names and the prize winners
informed.
Now
can you, and I certainly couldn't, imagine
what 40,000 slogans on a computer printout
look like?
Can you visualise 10,000 entry forms?
It's a real eye-opener!
One
competition promoter I spoke to, who handle
their own competitions in-house, told me
they open the entries as soon they arrive.
They check for the inclusion of qualifiers
and correct answers to the first part of the
task, just as the handling house does, but
instead of storing the entries in a safe
until after the closing date, they undertake
the preliminary judging on a daily basis.
As soon as they come across slogans
they feel are eye-catching and worthy of
further consideration, these are stored in a
safe place. Then after the closing date,
instead of the mammoth task of checking
thousands of entry forms in one session, the
preliminary judging has already taken place.
This company do not use computer printouts.
They simply bundle entry forms into piles of
one hundred each and every judge works
through several bundles of entry forms,
placing each separate form into one of two
piles, i.e. for further consideration or
rejection.
I
feel this is an excellent method of judging,
which is very fair to competitors, for each
judge has two piles of entry forms. He or
she then passes their pile of rejects to the
next judge sitting on their right. The
procedure is repeated, until every judge has
seen each entry form. Only then, when the
numbers of entries for the final judging
stage are fewer,
do they read them out loud, confer
and decide upon a winner. Sometimes, my
contact told me, an exceptional slogan is an
outright winner. Other times the judges may
have to take a vote on two or three
contenders for first prize. I have nothing
but admiration for judging sessions like
these.
My
observations are that, when your slogan is
being read, at whatever stage of the
judging, whether on a computer print out or
on the entry form, it stands on its own
merit. Either the judge likes it or he / she
doesn't. It's as simple as that.
A
perfect illustration of this was when myself
and another well-known comper were on
Granada TV's This Morning to talk about the launch of our
new books and were asked to judge a phone-in
contest.
As we were under pressure to come up
with a winner in a short time scale,
obviously we didn't have time to spend as
long as we'd have liked to read the entries.
Ushered
out to the phone-in room where several young
ladies were busily writing the entrants
name, telephone number and slogan onto
separate pieces of paper, we were initially
handed a bundle of around 500 entries.
Picture
the scene. We held them between to read
them. Sometimes we both said `No' at the
same time. Sometimes we said `yes we like
that' and that entry was put on our `further
consideration short list' pile. The fact is,
and this is an important point for you to
take on board and remember is,
that
we devoted a maximum TWO SECONDS for
each entry.
We
could tell, in that first "scanning of the
slogan", whether it grabbed our attention or
not. Although we put this entry on the
shortlist pile with other hopefuls, it was
so brilliant and imaginative it was
unanimously declared our outright winner. We
went back to the studio, to announce our
winner live on TV.
© Copyright 1993-2005 Lynne Suzanne www.win-with-lynne.co.uk
Editors free reprint rights
Editors
and webmasters are welcome to reprint
Lynne's articles in their own publications,
newsletters or on their websites, provided
author name and website address are
acknowledged. These works MUST NOT be reproduced for
financial gain.
About the
author
Lynne Suzanne is a consultant, freelance
writer and author of
Win With Lynne Intaslogans, Pun-ch Lines! and
Win Your Fortune in Prizes.
FREE Win With Lynne - How to Win
Competitions guide.
www.win-with-lynne.co.uk
Lynne's articles
FREE e-guide
Prize winning
and slogan books